MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248939355 · doi:10.46692/9781529200638.009

The Crown, Prime Minister and Government

2020· other· en· W4248939355 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrime ministerCrown (dentistry)Prime (order theory)Government (linguistics)Political scienceMathematicsLawPoliticsPhilosophyMedicineCombinatoricsLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Republic or monarchy The earliest Westminster Model constitutions – those of Australia, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa – took unambiguously monarchical forms. Executive power was vested in the Crown, which was also an integral part of the legislature. Even in the post-war era, many former colonies, on becoming independent from the British Empire, did not cease to be part of ‘Her Majesty's dominions’. They continued as ‘Commonwealth realms’, with the functions of the Head of State being performed by a Governor-General nominally appointed by the Queen. The Irish Free State was a more difficult case to classify. The characteristic ‘dominion-style’ provisions of the 1922 constitution, which were included to satisfy the terms of the Anglo-Irish treaty, were whittled away by successive amendments. The new Irish constitution adopted in 1937 established a popularly elected president as de facto Head of State. Yet it formally retained at least a vestigial link to the Crown, through the Executive Authority (External Relations) Act 1936; this strange arrangement persisted until 1949, when the Republic of Ireland Act 1948 came into effect. Although the powers and privileges of the Crown could be determined by each dominion through its own constitutional processes, Commonwealth membership at the time entailed a common allegiance to the Crown. By becoming a republic and ceasing to be part of His Majesty's dominions, Ireland – like Burma two years earlier – thereby ceased to be part of the Commonwealth. Despite this change in status, both Ireland and Burma retained Westminster Model constitutions in republican guise, with a ceremonial figurehead president taking over the functions that elsewhere would normally be performed by a Governor-General. The separation between what Walter Bagehot called the ‘dignified’ (ceremonial) and ‘efficient’ (governing) parts of the constitution, and the relegation of the Head of State to primarily symbolic and civic functions, makes the identity of the Head of State a secondary matter. In April 1949 – too late for Ireland – the rule binding Commonwealth membership to allegiance to the Crown was relaxed, by means of the London Declaration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and FederalismFrench-language works237,207