Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Fall 2018, artist Heather Hart installs a rooftop in the largest room of the Rodman Hall Art Centre for her exhibition Northern Oracle. She asks the question: “What do you want to say? Shout it from the rooftop!” Throughout history, thinkers, authors and artists have eloquently expressed their views on cultural and social phenomena in manifestoes. The function of a manifesto is to convince a public and encourage creative thinking. Reflecting on Heather Hart’s exhibition, students in Visual Arts, Studies in Arts and Culture, and French Studies at Brock University transform the Studio Gallery into a “manifesto room” in which they create their own statements, be they poetic, absurd or political, in English or in French. In a space that is both radical and respectful, visitors are invited to experience the pleasurable effects of surprise. A l’automne 2018, l’artiste Heather Hart installe le toit d’une maison dans la plus grande salle du Centre d’art de Rodman Hall pour son exposition Northern Oracle. Elle pose ainsi la question suivante : « Que veux-tu dire ? Crie-le sur le toit ! » Au cours du temps, penseurs, auteurs et artistes ont éloquemment exprimé dans des manifestes leurs vues sur des phénomènes culturels et sociaux. Un manifeste a pour fonction de convaincre un public et d’encourager une pensée créative. En réponse à l’artiste, des étudiant.e.s d’Arts visuels, Etudes en arts et cultures et Etudes en français transforment la galerie Studio en « pièce manifeste » dans laquelle elles/ils créent leurs propres déclarations, que celles-ci soient poétiques, absurdes ou politiques, en anglais ou en français. Dans un espace à la fois radical et respectueux, les visiteuses et visiteurs sont invité.e.s à faire l’expérience d’agréables effets de surprise. Curators / Commissaires – Catherine Parayre and / et Donna Akrey
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".