Bibliographic record
Abstract
DICTIONARY OF BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION. Edited by John H. Hayes. Nashville: Abingdon, 1999, pps. xlix, 653, xxxi, 675, ISBN: 0-687-05531-8. Reviewed by David Bundy. CATHOLICISM CONTENDING WITH MODERNITY: ROMAN CATHOLIC MODERNISM AND ANTI-MODERNISM IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT. Edited by Darrell Jodock. Cambridge University Press, 2000. Reviewed by Albert C. Vara. SBL HANDBOOK OF STYLE: FOR ANCIENT NEAR EASTERN, BIBLICAL, AND EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES. Edited by Patrick H. Alexander, John F. Kutsko, James D. Ernest, Shirley A. Decker-Lucke, and David L. Petersen. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1999, pp. xiv, 280, ISBN 1-56563-487-X, $24.95 cloth. Reviewed by Mark Dubis. JPS HEBREW-ENGLISH TANAKH: THE TRADITIONAL HEBREW TEXT AND THE NEW JPS TRANSLATION, Second Edition. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1999, pp. xxx, 2038, ISBN 0-8276-0656-7, $69.95 hardcover. Reviewed by Mark Dubis. HISTORICAL DICTIONARY OF THE REFORMATION AND COUNTER-REFORMATION. Edited by Hans J. Hillerbrand. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2000, ISBN: 0-8108-3673-4, $55.00. Reviewed by Iren Light Snavely. GOD AND THE CHIP: RELIGION AND THE CULTURE OF TECHNOLOGY. William A. Stahl. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1998, ISBN 0-88920-321-0. Reviewed by Stephen A. Major.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.556 | 0.512 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".