Bibliographic record
VenueAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal case studies and regulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical CampusHouston Methodist Research InstituteAnschutz Medical Campus, University of ColoradoUniversity of California, IrvinePerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of California, DavisHealth Science Center, University of TennesseeUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignCenters for Disease Control and PreventionMedical Center, University of PittsburghSickkids Research InstitutePontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSyddansk UniversitetHospital for Sick ChildrenMorsani College of MedicineSahlgrenska UniversitetssjukhusetUniversidade de São PauloUniversity of GhanaFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of SydneyRoyal Adelaide HospitalHebrew University of JerusalemCollege of Medicine, Seoul National UniversityUniversità degli Studi di Milano-BicoccaSeoul National UniversityAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleUniversity College CorkUniversity of RochesterUniversity of LimerickMassachusetts General HospitalQueen's University BelfastOchsner HealthPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of CincinnatiQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteRoyal College of Surgeons in IrelandUniversity of South FloridaSchool of Public Health, University of MichiganUniversity of OregonUniversité Paris DescartesSaint Louis UniversityIntermountain HealthcareHospital for Special SurgeryUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillQueen Mary University of LondonHuntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of BernThomas Jefferson UniversityPritzker School of MedicineSeoul National University HospitalQueensland University of TechnologyPrinceton UniversityRTI InternationalSidra MedicineSchool of Medicine, Indiana UniversityTel Aviv UniversityNational University of IrelandUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of California, San DiegoJohns Hopkins UniversitySchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences CenterNational Institutes of HealthSharp HealthCareBrigham and Women's HospitalWeill Cornell Medical CollegeUniversity of ConnecticutUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of TorontoImperial College LondonSamsungUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of OklahomaSan Diego State UniversityUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IIUniversity of PennsylvaniaUniversity of MissouriQueen's UniversityUniversity of MiamiUniversità Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio EmilaOregon Health and Science UniversityNorthShore University HealthSystemHelsingin YliopistoUniversity of California, San FranciscoU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesOhio State UniversityOregon National Primate Research CenterUniversity College DublinUniversity College LondonSamsung MedisonUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsMedicineIndex (typography)World Wide Web
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.608
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Quick stats
Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractno