MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249152182 · doi:10.1353/nin.2019.0002

The Echoes

2019· article· en· W4249152182 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Eldridge

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYesterdayVisual artsSingingArtBall (mathematics)AdvertisingArt historyMedia studiesSociologyManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Echoes David Eldridge (bio) “Get your program!” The bustling of fans on the concourse rushing to get to their seats while they chat about yesterday’s game and today’s starting pitchers. The smack of the ball hitting the catcher’s glove in the bullpen as the pitcher warms up. The cheers of the fans for the ceremonial first pitch. The antics of the team’s mascot. The crowd singing the National Anthem. “Play ball!” The crack of the ball hitting the bat for a home run. The cheers or boos of the hometown fans when the ball clears the fence. “You’re out!” “Safe!” The melodies from the stadium’s organ. The vendors yelling “Beer here!” or “Popcorn, get your popcorn!” The slinging of a peanut bag to a fan. “Take me out to the ball game.” [End Page 1] The final out. The cheers of the fans of the winning team. The bustling of fans on the concourse rushing to leave while they chat about today’s game and tomorrow’s starting pitchers. “See ya tomorrow.” [End Page 2] David Eldridge david eldridge is a baseball fan and a poet. While staying-at-home due to COVID-19, he was thinking about the images, sounds, and experiences he missed from the ballpark and decided to give them life in a poem. Copyright © 2021 University of Nebraska Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0140.010
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2370.121

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207