A review of electron–phonon coupling seen in the high‐<i>T</i><sub>c</sub> superconductors by angle‐resolved photoemission studies (ARPES)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This issue of pss (b) – basic solid state physics contains a collection of Review Articles on the rather controversially discussed topic of Electron–Phonon Interaction in High‐Temperature Superconductors, guest‐edited by Miodrag Kulić, Johann Wolfgang Goethe‐Universität Frankfurt/Main, Germany, with a Preface written by V. L. Ginzburg and E. G. Maksimov [1]. The cover picture, taken from the review [2] by T. Cuk et al., shows plots of the electron–phonon coupling vertex, g 2 ( k , k ′), where k , k ′ are the initial and final electron momentum for electrons scattered by the bond‐buckling phonon B 1g (the out‐of‐phase vibration of the in‐plane oxygen) in a tight‐binding model of the copper–oxygen plane. The momentum dependence of this vertex, along with the d‐wave superconducting gap and the van Hove singularity at the anti‐node, accounts for the momentum dependence of the collective mode coupling seen in angle‐resolved photoemission data on Bi2212. The present issue also sees the start of our rapid research letters , the fastest peer‐reviewed publication medium in solid state physics. For more information see www.pss‐rapid.com and the Editorial by the Editor‐in‐Chief Martin Stutzmann on page 7 [3].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".