Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advanced level study aids: biology John Churchman and Kath Pedder, 2000. John Murray, 278pp. £10.99. ISBN 0 7195 7630 X Reviewed by Gill Hickman Introduction to advanced biology Chris Clegg, 2000. John Murray, 518pp. £25.00. ISBN 0 7195 7671 7 Reviewed by Alex Waller In a jam and out of juice Dean Madden, 2000. National Centre for Biotechnology Education, 20pp. £5.00. ISBN 0 7049 1373 9 Reviewed by Pauline Lowrie and Carol Pemberton New understanding biology for advanced level Glenn and Susan Toole, 2000 (4th ed.). Stanley Thornes, 698pp. £30.00 ISBN 0 7487 3957 2. Reviewed by Alex Waller Sex education in secondary schools Jennifer K Harrison, 2000. Open University Press, 192pp. £15.99. ISBN 0-335-20107-5 Reviewed by Sue Marts The cell: a molecular approach Geoffrey M Cooper, 2000 (2nd ed.). ASM Press, 689pp. £28.95. ISBN 0-87893-106-6 Reviewed by MP Ripley The use of animals in higher education: problems, alternatives, & recommendations Jonathan Balcombe, 2000. Humane Society Press, 104pp. £19.95. ISBN 0 9658942 15 Reviewed by Michael Reiss Improving science education R Millar, J Leach, and J Osborne, 2000. Open University Press, 360pp. £22.50 ISBN 0 335 20645 X. Reviewed by Len Newton Fundamentals of anatomy and physiology Frederic H Martini, 2001 (5 ed.). Prentice-Hall Inc, 1101pp. £32.99. ISBN0 13 017292 8 Reviewed by Sue Howarth Lichens - an illustrated guide to the British and Irish species Frank S Dobson, 2001. The Richmond Publishing Co Ltd, 431 pp. £45.00. ISBN 0 85546 093 8 Reviewed by Julia Milligan The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland Jim Asher, Martin Warren, Richard Fox, Paul Harding, Gail Jeffcoate, and Stephen Jeffcoate, 2001. Oxford University Press, 430pp. £30.00. ISBN 019 850565 5 Reviewed by Chris Gay
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.530 | 0.481 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".