Canada's First World War, 1914–2014 / Le Canada dans la Première Guerre mondiale, 1914–2014
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This August marks the centenary of the beginning of the First World War. While the 2013 Speech from the Throne announced that the Government of Canada would be “commemorating the centennial of the First World War,” the anniversary will also be an occasion for others to discuss the war, its significance both in Canada and abroad, and the ways in which it has been studied, remembered, and forgotten over the intervening century. This discussion will bring together historians, the general public interested in the past, and the broader heritage community. As 2014 unfolds, new resources will be made available, such as the thematic website already launched by the Dictionary of Canadian Bibliography ( http://www.biographi.ca/en/theme_first_world_war.html ). Later this year we will be publishing our own forum on Canadian historians and the First World War. The Canadian Historical Review has always been part of this conversation. Since its first issue in 1920, nearly forty articles have appeared in the journal directly related to the war. They reflect general trends in Canadian and international historiography; indeed, the range of topics and methodologies is impressive. The history of the war and how historians have studied and taught it is, in no small measure, also the history of the CHR. The University of Toronto Press and the chr are pleased to be able to bring this collection of scholarship to our readers and the general public. All the articles listed in this bibliography are Open Access. You will find the bibliography complete with hyperlinks to each article on our website at http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/chr.95.1.97 . We invite you to explore these articles and look forward to seeing how commemoration and new trends in scholarship will inspire future work in the Canadian Historical Review. Happy reading.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".