MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249386089 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2017.8092050

Structurally enhanced contrast in photoacoustic microscopy with F-Mode imaging

2017· article· en· W4249386089 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael J. Moore, Michael C. Kolios

Bibliographic record

Venue2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaResearch and Innovation Foundation
KeywordsSPHERESMaterials scienceOpticsPopulationContrast (vision)TransducerMicroscopyAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new technique for photoacoustic (PA) image formation, termed `F-Mode', which capitalizes on variations in the power spectrum of PA signals to produce images with object specific contrast. The technique is applied to a PA dataset by calculating the signal power spectrum at each scan location, segmenting it into discrete frequency bands, and then forming an image representing the spatial power distribution for each band. The appearance of differently sized objects in the resultant F-Mode images is dynamic, and is dictated by the presence of structure specific features in the power spectra. To demonstrate the technique, black polystyrene microspheres with diameters of 6 and 10 μm were scanned using a PA microscope equipped with a 400 MHz transducer and 532 nm laser. The images demonstrated that with appropriate selection of frequency band, visualization of either population of spheres could be selectively enhanced; the 6 μm spheres being more prominent at 249 MHz, while the 10 μm spheres dominated in the 425 MHz F-Mode image. Further, unique frequency dependent patterning in images of individual spheres pointed towards sub-micron diameter fluctuations in spheres from the same population. This proof-of-concept work paves the way for future in vivo applications, such as selectively analyzing blood vessels of different diameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)Same topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207