MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249534835 · doi:10.1063/1.1615756

Photoinduced charge-transfer reaction at surfaces. II. HBr⋯Nan/LiF(001)+hv(610 nm)→Br−Nan+/LiF(001)+H(g)

2003· article· en· W4249534835 on OpenAlexafffund
Sergey Dobrin, Hong He, Fedor Y. Naumkin, J. C. Polanyi, Sergei A. Raspopov

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryAtom (system on chip)X-ray photoelectron spectroscopyDesorptionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)AdsorptionPhotochemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sub-monolayer of atomic sodium was deposited on LiF(001) at 40–90 K. The adsorbed sodium atoms and clusters were dosed with HBr, to form HBr⋯Nan/LiF(001) (n=1,2,…) complexes which were then irradiated by 610 nm laser-light to induce charge-transfer reactions. The reaction-product atomic H(g) was observed leaving the surface, by two-color Rydberg-atom TOF spectroscopy. The H-atom translational energy in its “fast” (0.9 eV) component exhibited structure (40±10 meV spacing) attributed to vibration of the NaBr residue at the surface following photoinduced reaction in Na…HBr. The cross-section of the harpooning event was obtained as 7.5×10−19 cm2 for the “fast” H-atom reaction-product. Investigation of the coverage and temperature dependencies of the H-atom signal and of temperature programmed desorption (TPD) and x-ray photoelectron spectra gave an activation barrier for surface diffusion of Na-atoms Ediff<170 meV. High-level ab initio calculations were employed to interpret the TOF and TPD spectra. The reaction precursors and products, Na-HBr, Na+-HBr, Na2-HBr, Na2Br, NaBr, and NaBr-HBr, were investigated in terms of potential energy surfaces, equilibrium structures, binding energies, and vibrational frequencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207