Genotyping of structural variation using PacBio high-fidelity sequencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Structural variations (SVs) pervade the genome and contribute substantially to the phenotypic diversity of species. However, most SVs were ineffectively assayed because of the complexity of plant genomes and the limitations of sequencing technologies. Recent advancement of third-generation sequencing technologies, particularly the PacBio high-fidelity (HiFi) sequencing, which generates both long and highly accurate reads, offers an unprecedented opportunity to characterize SVs and reveal their functionality. Since HiFi sequencing is new, it is crucial to evaluate HiFi reads in SV detection before applying the technology at scale. Results We sequenced wheat genomes using HiFi, then conducted a comprehensive evaluation of SV detection using mainstream long-read aligners and SV callers. The results showed the accuracy of SV discovery depends more on aligners rather than callers. For aligners, pbmm2 and NGMLR provided the most accurate results while detecting deletion and insertion, respectively. Likewise, cuteSV and SVIM achieved the best performance across all SV callers. We demonstrated that the combination of the aligners and callers mentioned above is optimal for SV detection. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of sequencing depth on the accuracy of SV detection. The results showed that low-coverage HiFi sequencing is capable of generating high-quality SV genotyping. Conclusions This study provides a robust benchmark of SV discovery with HiFi reads, showing the remarkable potential of long-read sequencing to investigate structural variations in plant genomes. The high accuracy SV discovery from low-coverage HiFi sequencing indicates that skim HiFi sequencing is an ideal approach to study structural variations at the population level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".