Bibliographic record
Abstract
This issue of Early Theatre presents three unusual pairings of overlapping ideas in articles we hope are of interest to our readers.All six articles deal with different ways of looking at place and authority, gender and age.Brandon Alakas discusses the Coventry plays in the context of age as vital to an individual's social advancement.He draws on records in Coventry's two principal religious guilds -the Corpus Christi and Trinity guilds -to illustrate the point, particularly visible in the preferential treatment of elders in The Weavers' Pageant (1534), that any ambitious citizen's necessary progression through the guild hierarchy to attain the highest levels of political status within the city confirms the profound interconnectedness between these guilds and the civic government.Alakas asks how this basic age categorisation arouses disruptions to the authority of the city's aged elite, and how the elders deal with such challenges to their administrative control.Matt Kozusko looks at the place of the theatre in early modern London, shaking up accepted views of local and critical authority.He argues that modern critics, despite the availability of REED volumes, are often not engaged in re-examining available data, preferring instead to rest on a conjectural paradigm or heuristic that has hardened, over the past couple of decades, into a new historicist version of 'fact'.Critics have collapsed boundaries and important distinctions in London jurisdiction and geography in the interest of a unified critical narrative that characterizes the theatre as a culturally marginal phenomenon.Kozusko's article questions the 'marginal' model of popular theatre by revising the current critical notion of the term 'liberties' and by re-examining jurisdiction and city authority in early modern London.Kristen McDermott and Brandon Centerwall also look at place, age, and authority, but from the point of view of the specialized performances at court and in children's theatres.McDermott explores the figure of the gossip in Jonson's two major works of 1608-9, The Masque of Queens and Epicoene.The masque seems to participate in James's paternal metaphors of statecraft and personal rule, asserting that the king's benevolent gaze lawfully penetrates even the traditionally privileged female space of the birthing-chamber.In Epicoene, the figure of the gossip comments more pointedly on the disruptive nature of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.358 | 0.207 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".