MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249613231 · doi:10.1111/josl.12323

Blog: Belonging, Identity, Language, Diversity (BILD)/Langage, Identité, Diversité, Appartenance (LIDA). http://bild-lida.ca/blog/

2018· article· en· W4249613231 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ron Darvin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sociolinguistics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultilingual Education and Policy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLIDAIdentity (music)CitationLibrary scienceSociologyPsychologyComputer scienceArtCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Launched in November 2014, the Belonging, Identity, Language, Diversity (BILD) / Langage, Identit e, Diversit e, Appartenance (LIDA) blog is published by the BILD Research Group, which began as a community of graduate students and faculty members in the Faculty of Education at McGill University in Montr eal, but now includes active and affiliate members from other universities in Qu ebec.In their brief introduction to the site, the members of the group articulate that their goal is 'to start conversations about local happenings and experiences in Montreal' and to 'write about the world around [them] from [their] own critical sociolinguistic perspective(s).'Published weekly and intended for academic and non-academic audiences, the site includes entries that are usually around 500 to 1000 words and can include photos, videos, or links to social media.While it can be written in any language or combination of languages, most entries are in English or French.It accepts guest bloggers, and provides full license in terms of genres and styles, publishing everything from brief, informal reflections, to poems and comic strips, and more academic-style essays.The BILD members review each other's posts, while a Blog Editor reviews and mentors guest bloggers.In the past five years, BILD has published upwards of 150 posts from researchers within Quebec, across Canada, and countries like Australia, Greece, the Netherlands, and the U.S.A.This goal of facilitating online conversation cannot be separated from the larger purpose of the BILD group, which founding member Mela Sarkar (22 December 2016) says was conceived as a democratic way of sharing information among 'a bottom-up, organic and uncontrived PLC [professional learning community].'The hope was that, through this PLC, junior scholars would be able to explore different ways of 'doing "being scholars."' Apart from engaging with peers and established

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1740.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of SociolinguisticsSame topicMultilingual Education and PolicyFrench-language works237,207