MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249619282 · doi:10.1063/1.4928419.1

10.1063/1.4928419.1

2015· dataset· en· W4249619282 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Koberinski, Anton Baglaenko, Marek Stastna

Bibliographic record

VenueDefault Digital Object Group · 2015
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstabilityMechanicsPhysicsTurbulenceGeometryRayleigh–Taylor instabilityClassical mechanicsGeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The classical gravitational instability of a layer of denser fluid overlying a layer of less dense fluid, commonly known as the Rayleigh-Taylor instability, has been studied for well over a hundred years. In this article, we present the results of numerical simulations of a variant of this instability in which a plug of dense fluid is released from rest in a thin channel between two flat, vertical walls, causing a downward acceleration of the entire fluid column and formation of boundary layers near the walls. The plug of dense fluid undergoes distinctly different evolution near the walls and in the fluid interior. The instability in the interior, which we label the “hammerhead” instability based on its shape, is robust over a range of physical parameters, but disappears below a threshold Schmidt number. Fluid near the wall is slowed, and thin tendrils that link the near wall fluid to the main body of the fluid plug form, and in some cases undergo their own instability. We characterize the fully three-dimensionalized state, finding that while bulk measures of kinetic energy three-dimensionalization do not discriminate between low and high Schmidt number cases, the geometric distributions of the dynamical parameters Q and R from the turbulence literature are profoundly different in the high Schmidt number case. Finally, we consider the role of shear in situations in which the two plates are not exactly vertical, demonstrating that shear diminishes the importance of three-dimensionalization, while the hammerhead instability remains relevant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1990.492

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDefault Digital Object GroupSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207