MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249688789 · doi:10.2118/133202-pa

Thermal Solvent Reflux and Thermal Solvent Hybrid Experiments

2010· article· en· W4249688789 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J. Ivory, T. Frauenfeld, C. Jossy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsInjectorPetroleum engineeringSolventSteam-assisted gravity drainageSteam injectionThermalPetroleumChemistryEnvironmental scienceOil sandsChemical engineeringMaterials scienceWaste managementThermodynamicsGeologyMechanical engineeringOrganic chemistryEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The experiments and numerical simulations described in this paper were performed to determine the effectiveness of the thermal solvent reflux and steam solvent hybrid processes and to determine the key parameters involved in these two processes. Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is the current technology of choice for Athabasca reservoirs. It is commercially proven and delivers high oil rates and high ultimate recoveries. However, it is energy intensive. In addition, steam injection may be limited by lack of water, by regulatory issues or by the fact that some reservoirs are water sensitive. Vapour-assisted petroleum extraction (VAPEX) does not have the energy and water problems associated with SAGD. However, it is inherently slower than SAGD. One solution to the above difficulties is to combine processes by heating the horizontal wellbores. The heat serves to initiate communication between the injector and the producer. In addition, it will increase the rate of diffusion of the solvent into the oil. Heat may be applied by electric heaters, with a closed steam or glycol loop, or by direct injection of steam. In the first three of four experiments described in this report, the wells were electrically heated. In the fourth experiment, steam was co-injected with the solvent. Two experiments using Hillmond oil showed that similar results were obtained whether heating was obtained by electrically heating the wells (thermal solvent reflux process) or by direct steam injection (steam solvent-hybrid process). For these two experiments, the oil rate and recovery were similar. Numerical simulations were used to history match the experiments and effective diffusivity values were estimated. Introduction The objective of the thermal solvent reflux experiments was to develop a solvent-assisted process for recovery of heavy oil from thick, cold reservoirs such as Cold Lake and Athabasca. The thermal solvent process concept (Figure 1) is • Inject solvent and produce oil through horizontal wells • Heat the injection and production wells to reboil the solvent in situ (solvent reflux) (i.e., in-situ recycle of solvent) The advantages of the thermal solvent reflux process are • Requires less heat than SAGD • Less steam plant emissions • Smaller solvent recycle plant on surface • Smaller injection facility needed • Does not inject water into the reservoir • Suitable for reactive reservoirs • No treatment of boiler feed water required • Minimal water disposal • Minimal oil/water separation facilities required • Heat will speed mass transfer over cold VAPEX

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207