Bibliographic record
Abstract
Until about a quarter of a century ago, Swedish research on English literature was almost exclusively associated with the four traditional universities -Lund, Uppsala, Stockholm, and Gothenburg -whose English Departments used to employ one professor, one reader, and a couple of senior lecturers specializing in literature.In the 1980s, occasional employees at the new universities of Umeå and Linköping began to produce work in the field.The next decade was dominated by a veritable explosion in tertiary education which created dozens of new provincial university colleges, some of which have since obtained university status.Before the 1990s, only about twenty-five senior scholars in Sweden were active in the Eng.Lit.field.After the Big Bang, the number was more than doubled; but the proportions of the subject are still modest in an international comparison.Within the boundaries of this small Swedish discipline, research on Victorian literature has long been a significant special area.(The question of whether it is likely to remain so will be raised later in this report.)Reviewing the scholarly output that Victorian studies in Sweden have generated, it is hard to discern any connection between that output and the country where it was actually produced: Swedish Eng.Lit.scholars write and publish in English, orientate themselves towards critical debates in English-speaking countries, and rely on British and American research libraries.However, the predominance of fiction in their work suggests a possible 'local' reason for their interest in the Victorian age: juvenile acquaintance with the great Victorian novels, whose romantic appeal trumped the not inconsiderable but decidedly more douce virtues of the homegrown products.Some Swedish work in the Victorian field has attained standardwork status and been published, or republished, by leading academic publishers in the English-speaking world.Inga-Stina Ewbank's still indispensable book on the Brontës, Their Proper Sphere: A Study of the Brontë Sisters as Early-Victorian Novelists, brought out by Arnold and by Harvard University Press in 1966, was the outcome of graduate work in Gothenburg.Lennart A.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".