MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4250023026 · doi:10.1161/str.46.suppl_1.wp28

Abstract W P28: Diffusion and T2 Star Weighted MR Angiography Mismatch Predicts Ischemic Penumbra in the Acute Stage

2015· article· en· W4250023026 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susumu Yamaguchi, Nobutaka Horie, Minoru Morikawa, Yohei Tateishi, Shuji Fukuda, Yoichi Morofuji, Tsuyoshi Izumo, Kentaro Hayashi, Akira Tsujino, Izumi Nagata

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePenumbraStroke (engine)Internal capsuleAngiographyInfarctionRadiologyInternal carotid arteryCardiologyModified Rankin ScaleInternal medicineMagnetic resonance imagingIschemiaMyocardial infarctionIschemic strokeWhite matter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: T2 star weighted MR angiography (SWAN) can detect slight changes of susceptibility caused by microbleeds. It has also been reported that SWAN can detect hemodynamic insufficiency as hypointensity area in the medullary or cortical veins. In this study, we investigate whether SWAN can help to detect ischemic penumbra in the acute stage. Materials and methods: Patients showing acute major vessel occlusion (internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery) within 4.5 hours from onset were consecutively analyzed with MR imaging including SWAN, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and MR angiography. To evaluate ischemic area in SWAN and DWI, modified Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (mASPECTS) was used as follows; M1~6 and basal ganglion including caudate, insula, lentiform or internal capsule. SWAN based mASPECTS was calculated with DWI based ASPECTS, and correlation between DWI-SWAN mismatch and final infarct area or outcome was evaluated. Result: Of 30 patients (mean age: 72.7 ± 13.3 years). Cardioembolic stroke was confirmed in 24 patients, atherothrombotic stroke was in 3 patients, and others had unknown etiology. Intravenous t-PA was performed in 17 patients, and endovascular therapy was performed in 17 patients. Overall, recanalization was achieved in 70% (21 patients) with lower modified Rankin Scale at 90 days compared with no recanalization (P=0.0004). Interestingly, SWAN based mASPECTS was significantly correlated with mRS at 90 days (R=-0.4382, P=0.02) regardless of recanalization. Of 9 patients showing no recanalization, DWI-SWAN mismatch was significantly correlated with new infarction (R=0.8221, P=0.0065). On the other hand, patients showing recanalization showed no correlation between mismatch and new infarct. Conclusion: DWI-SWAN mismatch could simply predict ischemic penumbra requiring immediate reperfusion. Assessment of ischemic penumbra from venous side using SWAN is quite useful without contrast media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→