Treatment of organic pollutants from pulp mill wastewaters using Fenton's oxidation process.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulp mill wastewater is essentially characterized by the presence of toxic organic and inorganic pollutants, and the industry is faced with the challenge of effectively removing these compounds before final disposal. In this study, the use of Fenton’s oxidation and its effectiveness in removing chemical oxygen demand (COD) and color from the pulp mill wastewaters was investigated. The study was conducted in two parts. In the first part, optimization of the various operating conditions for the process was conducted for COD removal. Different values of pH (2 to 6), temperature (30 to 50°C), H₂O₂ (0.1M to 6M), and Fe²⁺ (0.02M to 0.5M) were used. The second part involves the application of the Fenton’s process in treating different wastewaters obtained from 3 kraft pulp mills. Results obtained from the entire study indicated that the Fenton oxidation process is an effective treatment method for this type of wastewater as it enhances the efficiency of COD and color removal. Overall, this process can be considered effective as a pre-treatment and post treatment method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".