Information-motivation-behavioral skills model-based HIV risk behavior change intervention for inner-city high school youth.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un~ierslty ot HartfordThl\ study assesied the eftect.; of 3 theoreticall) grountled, school-based HIV prevention intcr\cntion~ on inner-cit!, minority high school students' levels of HIV pre\ention ~nfor~nxion.mot~~ation.heha\ ioral shill^, and heha\~or.11 in\ol\cd a quasi-expermental controlled trial comparing classroom-based.peer-habed.and cornb~ned classroo~n-and peer-based HIV preventloll ~uterventions with a stantlxd-ofcare control condit~on in 1 urban h~gh schools Ih' = 1,532.primar~l) 9th-grade students).At 12 nlonths postintervention, the classroon-based Intenentlon resulted in sustainctl changea In HIV prevention beha\ior.Thl.\ article diwusacs \vh) both of the inter\ent~ons in\ol\ing peers \\ere less effective than the clasaroo~n-based intervention at the 11-month follo\v-up and.more gencmllq, suggesta a set of possihle limiting contlit~ons for the eft~cacy o f peer-based inter\cntlon.\.Kt?. 110rt1\: IMK model, HIV pre\ention inlerwnt~on.high school HIV pre\ention
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".