MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4250338306 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-20221/v1

Components of antenatal care received by women in fishing communities on Lake Victoria, Uganda; a cross sectional survey

2020· preprint· en· W4250338306 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ali Ssetaala, Joan Nabawanuka, Gideon Matovu, Nusula Nakiragga, Judith Namugga, Phiona Nalubega, Henry Lutalo Kaluuma, Kundai Chinyenze, Katrina Perehudoff, Kristien Michielsen, Bernard S. Bagaya, Matt A. Price, Noah Kiwanuka, Olivier Degomme

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirektoratet for UtviklingssamarbeidInstitute of Circulatory and Respiratory HealthWorld Health OrganizationDepartment for International DevelopmentWorld Bank GroupInternational AIDS Vaccine InitiativeUdenrigsministerietIrish AidBill and Melinda Gates FoundationUnited States Agency for International Development
KeywordsCross-sectional studyGeographyFisheryFishingSocioeconomicsMedicineBiologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Uganda has one of the highest maternal deaths at a ratio of 336 per 100,000 live births. As Uganda strives to achieve sustainable development goals, components of antenatal care are key to reduction of maternal mortality. We explored women’s receipt of seven of the Uganda guidelines components of antenatal care, and associated factors in hard to reach Lake Victoria island fishing communities of Kalangala district.Methods: A cross sectional survey among 486 consenting women aged 15-49 years, who were pregnant or had a birth or abortion in the past 6 months was conducted in 6 island fishing communities of Kalangala district, Uganda, during January-May 2018. Interviewer administered questionnaires, in Open Data Kit software were used to collect data on socio-demographics and receipt of seven of the Uganda guidelines components of antenatal care. Regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with receipt of all seven components. Analyses were done using STATA version 15.1.Results: Women’s median (range) age was 26 (15-45) years, majority were married [87.0%, (423/486)], their main occupation was housewives (stay home mums) [45.1%, (219/486)] and never studied beyond seven years of education [69.1%, (336/486)]. Over three quarters of women who attended the nationally recommended four focused ANC visits did not receive all seven components of care at least once during the visits [76.4%, (107/140), P<0.05]. Women who reported being attended to by a doctor were thrice as likely to have received all seven components as those seen by a midwife/nurse (aOR=3.2; 95% CI:1.1-9.1).Conclusions: There is need to improve components of antenatal care received by women in these communities. Implementation programs need to evaluate receipt of antenatal care components among attendees in these hard to reach communities.Trial Registration: PACTR201903906459874 (Retrospectively registered).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→