O uso crônico de estatinas associado à miopatia e seus efeitos sob a qualidade de vida dos cardiopatas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: Objetivo deste estudo foi identificar a percepção da dor em portadores de dislipidemia por meio questionário de qualidade de vida, domínio dor McGill. Métodos: Estudo de abordagem descritiva transversal, amostra por conveniência, pacientes em tratamento na clínica de Fisioterapia, de uma Instituição de Ensino Superior.Utilizouum instrumentoque avalia a qualidade de vida, com ênfase no domínio: dor, denominado McGill, composto por 4 áreas da dor: qualidade sensorial, afetiva, temporal e miscelânea da dor. Resultados: 18 participantes, idade 70,6 ± 8,12 e 60,8 ± 11,86 anos respectivamente. A percepção da dor teve como características: “Formigamento” e “Dolorida” (22,2%) no grupo “Sensorial”; “Cansativa” (11,1%) no grupo “Afetivo”; “Que incomoda” (27,7%) no grupo “Avaliativo” e “Adormece” e “Repuxa” (5,5%) em Miscelânea. Conclusão: Sugere-se que o portador de dislipidemia, em uso de estatinas, segundo resultados desse estudo através do uso do questionário McGill, presencia a sua dor como aquela dor “que o incomoda” e dessa forma reduz a qualidade de vida.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".