Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nimi Wariboko, The Pentecostal Principle: Ethical Methodology in New Spirit, reviewed by Peter D. Neumann Reinhard Hütter, Dust Bound for Heaven: Explorations in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas, reviewed by Pamela J. Reeve Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, The Science of Logic, reviewed by Jeff Nowers G. William Barnard, Living Consciousness: The Metaphysical Vision of Henri Bergson, reviewed by Jean-Pierre Fortin Michael Attridge, Catherine E. Clifford, and Gilles Routhier, editors, Vatican ii: Canadian Experiences / Expériences canadiennes, reviewed by Ronald A. Mercier Paul Avis, The Identity of Anglicanism: Essentials of Anglican Ecclesiology, reviewed by David Neelands T.M. Luhrmann, When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God, reviewed by Donald Wiebe W.W. Bryden, The Christian's Knowledge of God, reviewed by Victor Shepherd John Cowburn, The Problems of Suffering and Evil, reviewed by Barry L. Whitney Stan Chu Ilo, Joseph Ogbonnaya, and Alex Ojacor, editors, The Church as Salt and Light, reviewed by Emmanuel-Mary Mbam Mike Higton, A Theology of Higher Education, reviewed by Donald Wiebe Daniel M. Bell Jr., The Economy of Desire: Christianity and Capitalism in a Postmodern World, reviewed by Alison Hari-Singh
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".