MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250539111 · doi:10.1177/0890334419851796

14 <sup>th</sup> Breastfeeding and Feminism International Conference: Roots and Wing: Looking Back, Looking Forward

2019· article· en· W4250539111 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Human Lactation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesDirektoratet for UtviklingssamarbeidInternational Development Research CentreUniversity of South FloridaUniversity of MassachusettsSigma Theta Tau InternationalStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsBreastfeedingFeminismPolitical scienceMedicineGender studiesSociologyPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Background: Considered a key area influencing children’s survival and the promotion of their healthy growth and development, infant nutrition remains a global public health priority. Situated within a web of gendered, social, political, institutional, and cultural dynamics, decisions surrounding infant feeding are complex and multifaceted. National and international health agencies (e.g., the American Public Health Association, Health Canada, and the World Health Organization) all advocate human milk as the optimal form of infant nutrition for the first 6 months of life and beyond. Nevertheless, when breast(chest)feeding is not possible or sustainable, many families opt for, or require, alternatives to their own milk to nourish their infants. For families of premature or critically ill infants hospitalized in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), the infant feeding process involves unique challenges and barriers. Ensuring optimal nutrition is a key concern for NICU providers in light of the medical fragility of the neonates under their care. As a result, feeding support for families in the NICU often focuses on the mechanical transfer of essential nutrition as opposed to the relational dimensions of the feeding experience for both mother and baby. In an environment where the decision to breast(chest)feed or to use alternative methods/modalities of feeding often goes beyond choice, NICU nurses and families engage in a unique feeding support dynamic. While infant feeding support has been previously studied in both qualitative and quantitative research domains, this area remains largely under-explored using a feminist lens within the neonatal intensive care environment. Purpose: Using a feminist, poststructural approach, the purpose of the proposed study is to deconstruct infant support interactions between primary feeding parents and nurses in the neonatal intensive care unit. Narrative: Primary feeding parents whose infants are admitted to a Level III NICU in Atlantic Canada will be recruited for participation. While individual, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews will be the primary method of data collection, participant observation during infant feeding support interactions is also planned. Interview transcripts and field notes taken during observation will be interrogated and interpreted using Discourse Analysis (DA), which is a cornerstone in feminist poststructural methodology. Conclusion: The results of the proposed study are intended to bring voice to the “unseeable” and “unsaid” complexities embedded in the interactions that nurses and primary feeding parents have in the NICU setting. In doing so, there exists the possibility of not only challenging the status quo but also identifying opportunities for necessary change and action."@eng

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6810.296

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Human LactationSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207