Bibliographic record
Abstract
Roman Králik, Abrahim H. Khan, Peter Šajda, Jamie Turnbull, and Andrew J. Burgess, eds., Acta Kierkegaardiana, Volume 3: Kierkegaard and Christianity, reviewed by Lee Barrett Pádraic Conway and Fáinche Ryan, eds., Studies in Theology, Society and Culture, Volume 3: Karl Rahner: Theologian for the Twenty-first Century, reviewed by Michael J. Iafrate Philip Tallon, The Poetics of Evil: Toward an Aesthetic Theodicy, reviewed by Charles Meeks James F. Keenan, A History of Catholic Moral Theology in the Twentieth Century: From Confessing Sins to Liberating Consciences, reviewed by Ronald Mercier Oliver D. Crisp, Jonathan Edwards on God and Creation, reviewed by Jill O'Brien Titus Chung, Thomas Torrance's Mediations and Revelation, reviewed by Victor Shepherd John Vissers, The Neo-Orthodox Theology of W.W. Bryden, reviewed by Victor Shepherd David L. Goicoechea, Agape and Personhood with Kierkegaard, Mother, and Paul (A Logic of Reconciliation from the Shamans to Today), reviewed by Leo Stan Randall W. Reed, A Clash of Ideologies: Marxism, Liberation Theology, and Apocalypticism in New Testament Studies, reviewed by Bruce Worthington Robin Ryan, cp, God and the Mystery of Human Suffering: A Theological Conversation across the Ages, reviewed by Catherine Wright
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".