MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250616052 · doi:10.4095/293973

Grand Banks Scour Catalogue (GBSC) GeoDatabase

2014· report· en· W4250616052 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpatial databaseGeographyDatabaseArchaeologyGeologyComputer scienceSpatial analysisRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the late 1990's and early 2000's, NRCan, through the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC), conducted research on the distribution and severity of seabed iceberg scour on the Grand Banks. One of the key products of that work was a research database that recorded the location and geometric parameters for all mapped seabed scours on the Grand Banks. The Grand Banks Scour Database (GBSC) was developed under GSC contract to Canadian Seabed Research Ltd. (CSR) and updated sporadically when funding allowed new data to be captured. With the wind-down of GSC work on Grand Bank seabed scour, it is important to formalize the database and release a standardized database in a documented and publicly accessible format. This report documents the development of a simplified GIS Geodatabase that represents the key scour parameters. The scours recorded in the GBSC were identified and measured from various geophysical data sets including; sidescan sonar, multibeam sonar, sub-bottom profiler, single beam echo sounder, and high resolution single channel seismic (Huntec) systems. The GBSC survey coverage consists of an irregular network of regional lines (22,704 km) and site surveys (4762 km2) conducted by the GSCA and the petroleum industry. The simplified GBSC Geodatabase compiled during this study contains 5366 iceberg furrow features and 2680 iceberg pit features. The interaction of ice and seafloor sediments may result in a variety of ice scour types and shapes. Features stored in the GBSC include furrows, furrows with an associated pit (s), individual pits and Pit Chains. Iceberg furrows and pits have been recorded in water depths ranging from 49 to 350 m and within sediment types of Predominantly Sand, Sand & Gravel, and Gravel. Although a significant number of furrows occur within each 10° orientation bin the general orientation mode of the GBSC furrow population is northeast - southwest. Furrow length ranges from 5 m to 10,216 m, with a mean length of 584.7 m while Pit area ranges from 84 m² to 111,300 m², with a mean area of 6193 m². Furrow width measurements range from 1 to 208 m with a mean width of 26 m. Furrow depth ranges from 0.1 m to 7.0 m, with a mean depth of 0.88 m while Pit depth ranges from 0.1 m to 8.3 m, with a mean of 1.92 m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it