MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4250623384 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10502798.1

Mobilization of geochemical elements in the active layer of permafrost to surface water in Russian Arctic

2020· preprint· en· W4250623384 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaowen Ji, Xianchuan Xie, Evgeny Abakumov, Vyacheslav Polyakov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostActive layerRiparian zoneGeologyHydrology (agriculture)ArcticSurface waterThermokarstSoil waterSurface layerEnvironmental scienceGeomorphologySoil scienceOceanographyLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The predicted increasing ground temperatures in the Arctic results in the deepening of the active layer and intensification of geochemical processes, which could affect the geochemical composition of surface waters. Determining the responses of the riparian soil systems to surrounding hydrological flows under changing climate conditions is important for understanding the seasonal changes in hydrological processes. Therefore, in this study, one soil core from the study area polygon rim (close to the Taz River, TA) and two soil cores from the riverain terrace (close to the Syoyakha River, SY and Murtyyakha River, MU) in Russian Western Siberia and their supra-permafrost water, adjacent stream flows and river water were sampled for analysis of geochemical elements. The results showed that most elements above their respective detection limits (Mn, Sr, Fe, Mg, Cr, Co, V, Pb, Al and Ca) started to accumulate in the downwards gleyed layer during September–October in response to the deepest thaw in the active layer. This study focused on the highly mobile elements, i.e., Mn, Ca, Mg, Al and Ti, in the deepest layer; and found the transport of organic matter in the upper layer carried these elements to both surface water ponds/flows and supra-permafrost water, and further, to the rivers. The best linear correlation for both stream flows and river water were Mn, which may be a proxy for predicting the processes occurring within the active layer during the annual summer-autumn thaw. Finally, landscapes with different ice contents may experience changes in the elements transported to surface waters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→