Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the alter‐globalization movement, Göteborg‐skravallerna , the riots that erupted around the EU summit in Gothenburg, Sweden, in June 2001, are mostly remembered as part of a canon of protests that defined the movement's heroic phase in the global North: Seattle, Prague, Quebec City, Gothenburg, Genoa. And yet the events in Gothenburg, usually overshadowed by the far bigger and more explosive protests that rocked Genoa only six weeks later, were important in their own right. Some 50,000 people took part in a number of demonstrations, workshops, parties, and indeed riots, facing around 2,500 police officers. Three demonstrators were shot with live ammunition, one critically, and over 1,000 demonstrators were arrested, with many receiving prison sentences on average 12 times longer than precedent would have dictated. As significant as the figures were in the context of Swedish politics, it was ultimately not for mere strength in numbers that the protests in Gothenburg would be remembered, but rather for their political impacts: they shook Swedish society to the core, thus revealing the political power of militant protest in the alter‐globalization movement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".