Bibliographic record
Abstract
Briefly Noted Lori A. Goetsch Is Consulting for You? A Primer for Information Professionals, Ulla de Stricker. Chicago: American Library Association, 2008. 101p. $40; member price $36 (ISBN 0-8389-0947-7) Knowledge Management: Historic and Cross-Disciplinary Themes, Danny P. Wallace. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2007. 235 p. $60 (ISBN 978-1-59158-502-2) Is Consulting for You? A Primer for Information Professionals, Ulla de Stricker. Chicago: American Library Association, 2008. 101p. $40; member price $36 (ISBN 0-8389-0947-7) Ulla de Stricker, a Toronto-based consultant, discusses skill sets in demand and benefits and challenges as well as business plan, proposal, and contract development in this straightforward guide to the realities of consulting. This volume is useful for anyone considering consulting as a supplement to or replacement for library employment. Knowledge Management: Historic and Cross-Disciplinary Themes, Danny P. Wallace. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2007. 235p. $60 (ISBN 978-1-59158-502-2) In this ambitious work, Danny Wallace, professor in the School of Library and Information Studies at the University of Oklahoma, takes on the slippery topic of knowledge management (KM). In an effort to comprehensively document the origins of and theoretical foundations for KM, Wallace explores and synthesizes a wide range of writings from education and philosophy to computer and information sciences. The book will be of particular interest to library and information sciences students and faculty. [End Page 170] Lori A. Goetsch Kansas State University, lgoetsch@ksu.edu Copyright © 2009 The Johns Hopkins University Press
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".