MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Novel mutations A210G and L15Q TBX5 gene in the patients with non-syndromic congenital defects of the heart septal

2020· preprint· en· W4250731991 on OpenAlexaff
Fariborz Soheili

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersKurdistan University Of Medical Sciences
KeywordsMissense mutationExonGeneticsGeneMutationBiologyMutation testingHeart diseaseMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The TBX5 transcription factor plays an important role during morphogenesis and development of the heart. Mutations in this gene often lead to Holt-Oram syndrome (HOS). This study identified mutations in patients with non-syndromic congenital heart defects (CHD). Screening for mutations TBX5 gene in non-syndromic CHD, including 100 patients with a septal defect and 50 healthy subjects as controls were performed by the technique of high-resolution melt (HRM). Exons were sequenced for samples that showed HRM curve differences compared to controls. Structural stability and pathogenic potential of mutated protein were evaluated by bioinformatics analysis. HRM curve analysis showed that the curves of three samples deviated from the curves of controls. Sequencing showed three heterozygous missense mutations including two novel mutations NM_000192.3:c.44T>G, (p.L15Q), NM_000192.3c.629C>G (p.A210G) and a known mutation NM_000192.3:c.331G>T (p.D111Y). The PolyPhen-2 software predicted the p.D111Y and p.A210G substitutions to be disease-causing and p.L15Q as possibly benign, while protein structural stability analysis by MUpro and DynaMut suggested that these mutations reduce stability and increase the flexibility of the protein. This study presents two novel missense mutations within the TBX5 gene that may be causal for non-syndrome CHD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207