MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4250796845 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-02/38/2359

Accelerated Degradation of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Gas Diffusion Layers: Mass Transport Resistance and Liquid Water Accumulation at Limiting Current Density with in operando Synchrotron X-ray Radiography

2016· article· en· W4250796845 on OpenAlexaff
Michael G. George, Hang Liu, Rupak Banerjee, Nan Ge, Pranay Shrestha, Daniel Muirhead, Jong‐Min Lee, Stéphane Chevalier, James Hinebaugh, Matthias Messerschmidt, Roswitha Zeis, Joachim Scholta, Aimy Bazylak

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellElectrolyteDegradation (telecommunications)Chemical engineeringMaterials scienceHydrogen peroxideDiffusionHydrogenLimiting currentChemistryElectrochemistryCatalysisElectrodeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) continues to develop as a viable alternative to the combustion engine in automotive applications. As this technology advances, it is critical that the PEMFC is capable of maintaining performance for long term operation. In an effort to understand the degradation of fuel cell performance over time, a study into the development of an accelerated gas diffusion layer degradation protocol was completed. As part of an effort to quantify the effects of this accelerated degradation, in situ synchrotron radiography imaging techniques were coupled with performance testing in order to quantify the effects of this degradation on water saturation profiles, transport resistance, and limiting current in an operating fuel cell. Gas diffusion layer samples of SGL 25 BC and SGL 29 BC were artificially aged in a concentrated solution of hydrogen peroxide (30% wt.) for a period of 12 hours at an elevated temperature of 90 degrees Celsius. Hydrogen peroxide facilitates chemical corrosion of the carbon material in the gas diffusion layer and was found to significantly affect the wettability of the degraded samples. Hydrogen peroxide was selected to facilitate the degradation mechanism due to the fact that it is a recognized chemical species found in operating fuel cells and produced at the catalyst layer (1, 2). The accelerated degradation procedure that was used in this study was found to primarily affect the wettability of the tested gas diffusion layers. Consequently, it was expected that the most significant impact of this degradation mechanism would be in the mass transport losses at high current densities. For this reason, a limiting current investigation was performed. Unlike other studies of limiting current in which the cathode oxygen concentration is varied (3), a limiting current study based on varying the relative humidity of reactant gases was performed. In this study, limiting current was measured for relative humidities of 0%, 50%, 80%, 90%, and 100% for several fuel cells with fresh and degraded GDLs. Simultaneous synchrotron imaging was used to quantify the distribution of liquid water in the anode and cathode of the operating cell during these limiting current studies. Trends with respect to reactant transport resistance, water saturation profiles, and limiting current were quantified as a function of relative humidity and degree of degradation. For all tested samples, as the relative humidity was reduced, the corresponding limiting current increased. It was also found that the limiting current liquid water saturation profile was independent of the reactant gas relative humidity. Additionally, artificial degradation led to increased liquid water saturation levels in the operating fuel cell. This work illustrates the potential impacts of long term fuel cell operation on the water management of PEMFC gas diffusion layers. References 1. C. Chen and T. Fuller, ECS Transactions., 11, 1 (2007). 2. W. Liu and D. Zuckerbrod, J.Electrochem.Soc., 152, 6 (2005). 3. D. R. Baker, D. A. Caulk, K. C. Neyerlin and M. W. Murphy, J.Electrochem.Soc., 156, 9 (2009).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→