MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4250928842 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11592

Examining the role of the promoter region of het-6 in escape from heterokaryon incompatibility in Neurospora crassa

2016· dissertation· en· W4250928842 on OpenAlexaff
Abiodun Laoye

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurospora crassaBiologyHeterokaryonGeneticsGeneMutantAlleleCrassaNeurosporaNull allele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heterokaryon incompatibility (HI) is a form of nonself recognition that limits the formation of heterokaryons -cells that contain genetically dissimilar nuclei.HI is controlled by several het loci.One of these, het-6 is a supergene complex that encodes two tightly-linked incompatibility genes, un-24 and het-6, with allelic variants Oak Ridge (OR) and Panama (PA), and only two natural haplotypes -un-24 OR het-6 OR or un-24 PA het-6 PA .het-6 encodes a HET domain protein with no known function outside of incompatibility, whereas un-24 encodes incompatibility function and the large subunit of ribonucleotide reductase.Strains incompatible at the het-6 locus can 'escape' from HI by mutation in the het-6 gene (Type I, ~97%), or suppress HI by mutation in a transcription factor called vib-1 (Type II, ~3%).This study examined the possible role of the het-6 promoter region in the initiation of escape, by introducing an ectopic het-6 OR allele into a strain that carried a null endogenous het-6 OR allele (IB20).Self-incompatible transformants exhibited delayed escape and aberrant post-escape behavior.A vib-1 mutant allele was introduced into IB20, and the resulting strain was also transformed with the ectopic het-6 OR .Transformants displayed Type-II like phenotype, but had slower growth rates than a typical Type II strain.Finally, we constructed a plasmid containing the het-6 OR allele in which the putative VIB-1 + binding site was deleted.Transformation of IB20 with this construct generated a transformant with a Type II-like growth phenotype.This study provides insight into the process of escape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→