MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250973879 · doi:10.1017/s109285290002798x

CNS Volume 14 supplement 16 Cover and Front matter

2009· article· en· W4250973879 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCNS Spectrums · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of California, San DiegoSchool of Medicine, Stanford UniversityUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeUniversität WienUniversity of New South WalesUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of CincinnatiUniversity of WashingtonRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnHarvard UniversityVanderbilt UniversityYale UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaMassachusetts General HospitalVanderbilt University Medical CenterNational Institute of Mental HealthPfizer
KeywordsFront coverFront (military)Cover (algebra)Volume (thermodynamics)Action (physics)Content (measure theory)Computer scienceEngineeringPhysicsMathematicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a common condition in the population occurring in 2% to 4% of adults living in the United States. Characterized by chronic widespread pain for at least 3 months and the presence of widespread mechanical tenderness, FM typically affects women and can be found in patients of varying ages who present in both primary care and psychiatric settings. As there are a number of other clinical syndromes which often occur with FM, it is important for clinicians to have a current understanding of the etiology of the syndrome and its diagnostic criteria. Conditions that occur comorbid with FM include lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren's syndrome, and osteoarthritis, among others. Due to its chronic nature, FM often occurs highly comorbid with anxiety and depression, which can also worsen patient pain ratings. The optimal management of FM is comprised of both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches, including use of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and/or cognitive-behavioral therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.891

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1200.110

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCNS SpectrumsSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207