MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251066043 · doi:10.4133/1.2927059

UXO Discrimination and Identification Using Magnetometry

2002· article· en· W4251066043 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephen Billings, Leonard R. Passion, Douglas W. Oldenburg

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2002 · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetometerIdentification (biology)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligencePhysicsMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PreviousNext No AccessSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2002UXO Discrimination and Identification Using MagnetometryAuthors: Stephen D. BillingsLeonard R. PassionDouglas W. OldenburgStephen D. BillingsGeophysical Inversion Facility, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Leonard R. PassionGeophysical Inversion Facility, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, and Douglas W. OldenburgGeophysical Inversion Facility, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BChttps://doi.org/10.4133/1.2927059 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Introductory paragraph for this paper is available only in the PDF and GZipped PS filesPermalink: https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2927059FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByMarine UXO detection: Critical analysis of the magnetic workflowSara Lise Underhay, Mark E. Vardy, and Timothy J. Henstock11 June 2021Magnetic survey and autonomous target reacquisition with a scalar magnetometer on a small AUV2 May 2020 | Journal of Field Robotics, Vol. 37, No. 7UXO Detection by Multiscale Potential Field Methods3 May 2019 | Pure and Applied Geophysics, Vol. 176, No. 10A Comparison of the Finite-Element Method and Analytical Method for Modeling Unexploded Ordnance Using MagnetometryIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 50, No. 75. Inversion for Applied Geophysics: A Tutorial21 March 2005 Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2002ISSN (online):1554-8015Copyright: 2002 Pages: publication data© 2002 Copyright © 2002 The Environmental and Engineering Geophysical SocietyPublisher:Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society HistoryPublished: 30 Sep 2008 CITATION INFORMATION Stephen D. Billings, Leonard R. Passion, and Douglas W. Oldenburg, (2002), "UXO Discrimination and Identification Using Magnetometry," Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems Proceedings : 12UXO4-12UXO4. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2927059 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2002Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207