MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LooK SPOT Antigen Rapid Test System v2

2020· preprint· en· W4251075776 on OpenAlexaff
Diego Lai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Canadian institutionsLaipac Technology (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)MedicinePoint-of-care testingWaiverAntigenInfection controlPoint of careImmunoassayTransmission (telecommunications)ImmunologyVirologyIntensive care medicineAntibodyBiologyPathologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LooK SPOT COVID-19 antigen rapid test is a lateral flow immunoassay intended for the qualitative detection of nucleocapsid protein antigen from SARS-CoV-2 in nasal swabs from patients suspected of COVID-19 within the first seven (7) days of symptom onset. Testing is limited to laboratories certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA), 42 U.S.C. §263a, that meet the requirements to perform moderate complexity tests. This test is authorized for use at the Point of Care (POC), i.e., in a patient care settings operating under a CLIA Certificate of Waiver, Certificate of Compliance, or Certificate of Accreditation.]. Results are for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein antigen. The antigen is generally detectable in nasal samples during the acute phase of infection. Positive results indicate the presence of viral antigens, but the clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine infection status. Positive results do not rule out a bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of thedisease. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities. Negative results should be treated as presumptive, and do not rule out SARS-CoV-2 infection, and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or patient management decisions, including infection control decisions. Negative results should be considered in the context of a patient's recent exposures, history, and the presence of clinical signs and symptoms consistent with COVID-19, and confirmed with a molecular assay, if necessary, for patient management. LooK SPOT COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test can deliver a diagnosis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus detection between 5 to 8 minutes by using machine learning AI. LooK SPOT’s AI algorithm has high accuracy and can identify the fluorescence response when human eyes cannot identify the low positive cases. Healthcare responders in the COVID-19 test sites often need to make time-sensitive decisions to determine the test results during the time many patients are within their vicinity. But the tempo, volume, stress, fatigue, lighting, fear, and various other factors can overwhelm healthcare responders when making the visual interpretation of antigen test results. It is of paramount importance to reduce healthcare responders' cognitive load by providing accurate test results in an easy-to-read format. LooK SPOT COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test is a COVID-19 rapid test solution designed with a tactical edge to fight COVID-19. The LooK SPOT COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test is intended for use at the Point of Care (POC) settings by trained personnel specifically instructed and trained in vitro diagnostic procedures. It is only for use under the Food and Drug Administration's Emergency Use Authorization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingFrench-language works237,207