O conceito de tempo: Conferência pronunciada para a Sociedade de Teólogos de Marburgo, julho de 1924
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A conferência O conceito de tempo (1924), proferida para a Sociedade de Teólogosde Marburgo, situa-se no âmbito da analítica existencial de Ser e tempo, portanto, noâmbito do primeiro Heidegger, em que se trata da colocação da questão do ser a partirdo sentido (existencial) e, portanto, temporal do ser. Apesar das diferenças em relaçãoa Ser e tempo, sobretudo no que se refere a uma definição mais clara da questão do ser,uma vez que o tema é o ser do tempo tanto como a base do modo de ser do Dasein(ser-aí) quanto como a consequência de suas atitudes, podemos afirmar que estaconferência já constitui uma versão condensada do tratado de 1927. As principaisestruturas existenciais do ser do Dasein já se encontram nela delineadas. Este textofornece uma bela amostra de como, em meados dos anos 20, Heidegger se encontravanuma intensa elaboração de sua questão filosófica fundamental.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".