Operative trends and physician treatment costs associated with Dupuytren's disease in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose To examine treatment trends and costs associated with Dupuytren's disease (DD) in Canada. Methods Data regarding fasciectomies, fasciotomies and digit amputations performed for DD from 2005 to 2010 were extracted from the Canadian Institute for Health Information database. The data were analyzed according to year, sex and five-year age groups. The estimated annual physician reimbursement costs for DD in Ontario were calculated using Ontario Health Insurance Plan billing information and the 2010 Physician Schedule of Benefits. Results The number and rate of fasciectomies remained stable from 2005 to 2009 (mean of 4067 and 1.24 per 10,000, respectively), but increased in the 2009/2010 fiscal year (to 4458 and 1.32 per 10,000). The number of fasciotomies increased from 133 in 2005/2006 to 201 in 2008/2009, but dropped to 183 in 2009/2010. The mean number of amputations remained stable (12 procedures). The ratio of males to females undergoing fasciectomies remained stable (4:1). The highest rate of fasciectomies was performed for the age groups 65 to 69 years and 70 to 74 years. Estimated mean physician remuneration for DD in Ontario remained stable ($3.2 million per annum). Discussion The results regarding patient demographics are comparable with results from previous literature. There was a trend toward an increasing number of fasciectomies and fasciotomies annually, with fasciotomies increasing faster than fasciectomies, which is reflective of the aging population and the recent attention to fasciotomies in the literature. The present study was the first to investigate treatment trends and physician reimbursement costs for the management of DD in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".