MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251320811 · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw094

Obituary

2016· paratext· en· W4251320811 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joan Berzoff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe British Journal of Social Work · 2016
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObituaryGriefResidenceActive listeningPsychologySociologyHistoryPsychiatryDemographyPsychotherapistArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr Phyllis Silverman, a pioneer in the field of death and bereavement, died in Lexington, Massachusetts, on 10 June 2016. A tiny, fit, silver-dark-haired woman, who swam almost every day of her adult life until she became ill, was a forceful, perceptive and outspoken proponent of valuing and listening to the expertise of the bereaved and of learning from them. In the course of her learning, she wrote or co-authored twelve books, fifty book chapters and thirty-five first and co-authored articles, and served as a Professor at the MGH Institute of Health Professions, a Scholar in Residence at the Women’s Studies Research Center, Brandeis University and as a founder of The Children’s Room in Arlington, MA, where she taught, supervised and applied the theories that she developed. She was a Co-Principal Investigator in the Child Bereavement Study at the Massachusetts General Hospital, the winner of multiple awards for her groundbreaking work on children’s grief, books on widows and widowers, and on processes of grief, and she enjoyed an international reputation, teaching in Israel, Canada, Australia, Hong Kong, South America and many other places.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4790.321

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe British Journal of Social WorkSame topicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207