Goal setting in children with unilateral cerebral palsy participating in an intensive motor learning and brain stimulation trial: characteristics and associations with outcome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
8 weeks MiYoga group (n=21) or 8 weeks Waitlist control group (n=21).Materials/Methods: MiYoga was an 8-week program that consisted of six 90-minute sessions and 2 phone consultations to help participants integrate MiYoga practices into their everyday life.In addition, during the 8-week duration of the program, children-parent dyads were asked to partake in a minimum of 20 minutes daily home practices along with the MiYoga DVD and the MiYoga poster.The primary outcome of interest was children's sustained attention measured by variables from the Conner's Continuous Performance Task (CPT)the Hit Reaction Time Block Change (HitRT block change) as well as the Omissions and Commissions Block Change variables.Results: Children in the MiYoga group demonstrated significantly better sustained attention post intervention compared to the control group on the HitRT Block Change variable of the CPT (attention was better sustained for the duration of the task) F(1,33)=4.98,p=0.03, partial eta squared=0.14(ANCOVA).Further analysis confirmed that the MiYoga group demonstrated ability to focus and maintain attention on task across the blocks in the treatment group post MiYoga compared to waitlist control group.Conclusions/Significance: MiYoga, a family focused lifestyle intervention, was associated with improvements in sustained attention for children with unilateral and bilateral CP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".