MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251368450 · doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12812

Issue Information

2019· paratext· en· W4251368450 on OpenAlexaff
Alireza Malehmir, M. Manzi, Deyan Draganov, U. Weckmann, Esben Auken, Milan Marković, Georgiana Maries, Julius von Ketelhodt, E. Bäckström, Michael P. Schön, Philip D. Marsden, Lena Bräunig, Stefan Buske, Guillermo Donoso, Nelson Pacheco, Vı́tor Araújo, Mark Penney, José Martins Carvalho, Steven R. H. Beach, Saeid Cheraghi, Mostafa Naghizadeh, D. B. Snyder, Rasmus Haugaard, Thomas Gemmell, I. Takács, B Annesley, Glyn Cooper, Raymond Durrheim, A Brodic, L Malehmir, F. Da Col, Maria V. Papadopoulou, Emilia Koivisto, Luanda Sito, Mikko Savolainen, Laura Valentina Socco, G Bellefl Eur, Ernst Schetselaar, D Wade, David A. White, R J Enkin, D. Schmitt, C Walter, Grigorios Fotopoulos, De Molen, Jan Tijmen, Angus I. Best, Noalwenn Dubos‐Sallée, Giovanni Florio, Felix Herrmann, Mohamed Luheshi, O. Ritter, Giuliana Rossi, Mohammed Alfaraj, Philip Armstrong -Borehole, Anna Avdeeva, Bellefleur -Hard Gilles, Andrej Bona -Time, John Brittan, Irina Elysseieva -Gravity, Stig‐Kyrre Foss, Fuensanta Gonz Ález Montesinos -Geodesy, Peter Lelièvre -Gravity, Raffaele Persico, René-Edouard Plessix -Wave, Ray Theory, Optimisation Gordon Poole -Seismic, Jaume Pous -Electrical, Methods Patrick, Matteo Ravasi, Alan W. Reid, Partha Routh -Near, Joël Geothermal, Juan Soldo - d, Rita Streich, Henri-Pierre Valero -Logging, Aldo Petrophysics

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Prospecting · 2019
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationComputer scienceLibrary scienceInformation retrievalWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wiley's Corporate Citizenship initiative seeks to address the environmental, social, economic, and ethical challenges faced in our business and which are important to our diverse stakeholder groups. Since launching the initiative, we have focused on sharing our content with those in need, enhancing community philanthropy, reducing our carbon impact, creating global guidelines and best practices for paper use, establishing a vendor code of ethics, and engaging our colleagues and other stakeholders in our efforts. Follow our progress at www.wiley.com/go/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8850.781

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical ProspectingSame topicGeotechnical and Geomechanical EngineeringFrench-language works237,207