Bibliographic record
Abstract
04–164Aronin, Larissa (U. of Haifa, Israel; Email: Larisa@research.haifa.ac.il ) and Ó Laorie, Muiris. Multilingual students' awareness of their language teacher's other languages. Language Awareness (Clevedon, UK), 12, 3&4 (2003), 204–19. 04–165Beatty, Ken (City U., Hong Kong; Email: Isken@cityu.edu.hk ) and Nunan, David. Computer-mediated collaborative learning. System (Oxford, UK), 32, 2 (2004), 165–83. 04–166Berry, Roger (Lingnan U., Hong Kong; Email: rogerb@ln.edu.hk ). Awareness of metalanguage. Language Awareness (Clevedon, UK), 13, 1 (2004), 1–16. 04–167Chang, Jin-Tae (Woosong University, Korea; Email: jtchang@lion.woosong.ac.kr ). Quasi-spoken interactions in CMC: email and chatting content analysis. English Teaching (Anseonggun, South Korea), 58, 3 (2003), 95–122. 04–168Chung, Hyun-Sook (International Graduate School of English, South Korea; Email: sook@igse.ac.kr ). Does subject knowledge make a significant contribution beyond that of L2 listening ability to L2 listening?English Teaching (Anseonggun, South Korea), 58, 3 (2003), 21–40. 04–169Cunico, Sonia (Leicester U., UK). Translation as a purposeful activity in the language classroom. Tuttitalia (Rugby, UK), 29 (2004), 4–12. 04–170Dodigovic, Marina (Zayed U., Dubai, UAE; Email: Marina.Dodigovic@zu.ac.ae ). Natural language processing (NLP) as an instrument of raising the language awareness of learners of English as a second language. Language Awareness (Clevedon, UK), 12, 3&4 (2003), 187–203. 04–171El-Dib, M. A. (Zagazig U., Egypt). Language Learning strategies in Kuwait: links to gender, language level, and culture in a hybrid context. Foreign Language Annals (Alexandria, Virginia, USA), 37, 1 (2004), 85–95. 04–172García Mayo, María del Pilar (U. of the Basque Country, Spain; Email: fipgamap@lg.ehu.es ). Interaction in advanced EFL pedagogy: a comparison of form-focused activities. International Journal of Educational Research (Abingdon, UK), 37 (2002), 323–41. 04–173Ghaith, Ghazi (American U. of Beirut, Lebanon). Effects of the Learning Together model of co-operative learning on English as a Foreign Language reading achievement, academic self-esteem, and feelings of social alienation. Bilingual Research Journal (Arizona, USA), 27, 3 (2003), 451–74. 04–174Hansen, Jette G. (U. of Arizona, USA; Email: jhansen@u.arizona.edu ). Developmental sequences in the acquisition of English L2 syllable codas – a preliminary study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (New York, USA), 26, 1 (2004), 85–124. 04–175Havranek, Gertraud (U. of Klagenfurt, Austria; Email: gertraud.havranek@uni-klu.ac.at ). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed?International Journal of Educational Research (Abingdon, UK), 37 (2002), 255–70. 04–176Hegelheimer, Volker (Iowa State U., USA; Email: volkerh@iastate.edu ) and Tower, Dustin. Using CALL in the classroom: Analyzing student interactions in an authentic classroom. System (Oxford, UK), 32, 2 (2004), 185–205. 04–177Hester, Elizabeth (Wichita State U., USA; Email: hestere@newpaltz.edu ) and Hodson, Barbara Williams. The role of phonological representation in decoding skills of young readers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy (London, UK), 20, 2 (2004), 115–33. 04–178Kim, Haeyoung (Catholic U. of Korea, South Korea; Email: haeyoungkim@catholic.ac.kr ). Effects of free reading on vocabulary competence in the first and second language. English Teaching (Anseonggun South Korea), 58, 4 (2003), 273–92. 04–179Klapper, John and Rees, Jonathan (Birmingham U., UK; Email: j.i.rees@bham.ac.uk ). Marks, get set, go: an evaluation of entry levels and progress rates on a university foreign language programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (London, UK), 29, 1 (2004), 21–39. 04–180Kuiken, Folkert (U. of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Email: f.kuiken@uva.nl ) and Vedder, Ineke. The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research (Abingdon, UK), 37 (2002), 343–58. 04–181Letao, S. and Fletcher, J. (U. of Western Australia, Australia). Literacy outcomes for students with speech impairment: long-term follow-up. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders (Abingdon, UK), 39, 2 (2004), 245–56. 04–182Lindberg, Inger (Göteborg U., Sweden; Email: inger.lundberg@svenska.gu.se ). Second language awareness: for what and for whom?Language Awareness (Clevedon, UK), 12, 3&4 (2003), 157–71. 04–183Lyster, Roy (McGill U., Canada; Email: roy.lyster@mcgill.ca ). Negotiation in immersion teacher-student interaction. International Journal of Educational Research (Abingdon, UK), 37 (2002), 237–53. 04–184Martino, W. Boys, masculinities and literacy: addressing the issues. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy (Adelaide, Australia), 26, 3 (2003), 9–27. 04–185McDonough, Kim (U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA; Email: mcdonokr@uiuc.edu ). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System (Oxford, UK), 32, 2 (2004), 207–24. 04–186Meara, P. (U. of Wales Swansea, UK). Modelling vocabulary loss. Applied Linguistics (Oxford, UK), 25, 2 (2004), 137–55. 04–187Mori, Reiko (Fukuoka Prefectural U., Japan; Email: mori@fukuoka-pu.ac.jp ). Staying-in-English rule revisited. System (Oxford, UK), 32, 2 (2004), 225–36. 04–188Roche, Jörg and Scheller, Julija (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany). Zur Effizienz von Grammatikanimationen beim Spracherwerb [The efficiency of grammar animations in the process of learning foreign languages]. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, Online Journal, 9, 1 (2004), 15 pp. 04–189Saito, H. & Eisenstein Ebsworth,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.322 | 0.211 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".