MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W42515807

Synergistic effect of C2H2 type Zinc-finger protein with LEA promoter to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in 'Brassica juncea'

2013· article· en· W42515807 on OpenAlexaff
Shiv Verma, Viswanathan Chinnusamy, Muhammad Asif, KC Bansal

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Omics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrassicaAbiotic componentAbiotic stressBiologyZinc fingerTransgeneBotanyGenetically modified cropsGeneTranscription factorGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cys2/His2 (C2H2) type zinc finger (ZF), and Late-embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins are associated with various cellular processes that play an important role in plant development and abiotic stress tolerance. The study was designed to evaluate the role of PLEA1:BcZF1 to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in Brassica juncea. The Group 4 LEA, LEA4-1, and ZF proteins isolated from B. napus and B. carinata respectively; were expressed in B. juncea cv. varuna. Expression of ZF protein in B. juncea under the control of LEA promoter showed increased tolerance against multiple abiotic stresses: salt, oxidative and drought. The increased level in the stability of total cellular membrane was observed in the transgenic lines (ZL1, ZL2 and ZL4) of B. juncea. The phenotypic analysis of transgenic lines also showed increased level of root and shoot length as compared to wild type (WT) plants under abiotic stresses. Our study suggest that cDNA encoding BcZF1 and the promoter LEA1 function as regulatory molecules involved in stabilizing and modulating the optimal plant growth under various abiotic stresses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant OmicsSame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207