MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251652261 · doi:10.22215/etd/2017-13861

Development of Preheating and Power Inverting Systems for Lithium-Ion Batteries

2017· dissertation· en· W4251652261 on OpenAlexaff
Long Zhai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoule heatingBattery (electricity)Heating systemBattery packElectrical engineeringNuclear engineeringElectric heatingLithium (medication)Internal resistanceAutomotive engineeringInverterLithium-ion batteryPower (physics)Energy storageCurrent (fluid)Internal heatingMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel short-circuit self-heating (SCSH) control system was developed in this thesis to achieve the preheating of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries operated in extremely cold weather (< -30°C).The proposed system relies on the internal resistance of batteries and the short circuit current to heat up batteries using Joule heating.Experiments show that the SCSH control system can heat up the commercial Panasonic 18650 Li-ion batteries from -30°C to 0°C in 43 seconds, with less than 5 percent of the battery capacity consumed.The proposed heating system outperformed both external convective air heating and alternating current (AC) heating, in terms of heating time and energy consumption.Furthermore, a DC to AC battery power inverter was developed to implement the AC heating and to make the battery pack available for household appliances.This inverter employs a microcontroller using the direct pulse width modulation (DPWM) technique.The inverter achieves power output at various frequencies through programming, without changing the design of the circuit board.The optimal frequency ratio can be obtained theoretically, validated through MATLAB simulation, and was further examined through experimentation.The selected frequency ratio enables the DPWM signals to stimulate the designed inverter to produce high quality sinusoidal voltage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207