Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2016), "List of Contributors", Perverse Politics? Feminism, Anti-Imperialism, Multiplicity (Political Power and Social Theory, Vol. 30), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. vii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0198-871920160000030011 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2016 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Savina Balasubramanian Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA Elizabeth Bernstein Barnard College, New York City, NY, USA Jennifer Carlson University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada Kimberly Kay Hoang University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Ann Shola Orloff Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA Raka Ray University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA Evren Savcı San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA Talia Shiff Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA Book Chapters Perverse Politics? Feminism, Anti-Imperialism, Multiplicity Political Power and Social Theory Perverse Politics? Feminism, Anti-Imperialism, Multiplicity Copyright Page List of Contributors Senior Editorial Board Student Editorial Board Editorial Statement Introduction: Perverse Politics? Feminism, Anti-Imperialism, Multiplicity Perverse Humanitarianism and the Business of Rescue: What’s Wrong with NGOs and What’s Right about the “Johns”? Redemptive Capitalism and Sexual Investability Troubling the Subject of Violence: The Pacifist Presumption, Martial Maternalism, and Armed Women in Contemporary Gun Culture Feminism/s in Power: Rethinking Gender Equality after the Second Wave Contextualizing the Closet: Naz, Law, and Sexuality in Postcolonial India Subjects of Rights and Subjects of Cruelty: The Production of an Islamic Backlash against Homosexuality in Turkey
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.733 | 0.739 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".