MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251781653 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-3383

Abstract 3383: EPIC: MHC-I epitope prediction integrating mass spectrometry derived motifs and tissue-specific expression profiles

2019· article· en· W4251781653 on OpenAlexaff
Weipeng Hu, Si Qiu, Youping Li, Geng Liu, Xiuqing Zhang, Leo J. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitopeHuman leukocyte antigenComputational biologyMajor histocompatibility complexBiologyGeneComputer scienceAntigenGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Accurate prediction of epitopes presented by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is crucial for personalized cancer immunotherapies targeting T cell epitopes. Mass spectrometry (MS)profiling of eluted HLA ligands, which provides unbiased, high-throughput measurements of HLA associated peptides resulting from in vivo cellular processing, can be a highly valuable training set to build predictive models of HLA binding. In addition, gene expression profiles measured by RNA-seq data in a specific cell type could significantly improve the positive predictive value (PPV) of epitope presentation prediction. Although large amount of high-quality mass spectrometry data of HLA-bound peptides is being generated in the last few years, few of them provide matching RNA-seq data, which makes incorporating gene expression into epitope prediction difficult. Here, we aim to develop a publicly available prediction tool incorporating both sources of information, and demonstrate its superior performance over existing methods. Methods: We obtained public HLA peptidome datasets with matching RNA-seq data of twelve cell lines derived from multiple tissues. We used these MS HLA ligand data to build Position Score Specific Matrixes (PSSMs) for five HLA-I alleles across these cell lines. We then used logistic regression to model the relationship among PSSM score, gene expression, peptide length distribution and whether the peptide could be presented in each of the twelve cell lines, and compared the feature weights among them. Results: We found that the feature weights across different HLA-I alleles and cell lines were close to each other, suggesting that there is a universal relationship between PSSM score and gene expression across different cell lines that could be applied to epitope presentation prediction for multiple alleles in diverse tissues. When we replaced the cell-line-specific weights with universal weights summarized from all the cell lines, the logistic regression model’s predicted power for each cell line only dropped slightly and still substantially outperformed predictions based on PSSM scores alone. Based on such a finding, we applied the universal feature weights to more than 180,000 unique HLA ligands collected from public HLA peptidomics datasets, and presented an Epitope Presentation Integrated prediCtion (EPIC) model for 66 HLA alleles. EPIC was substantially better than other popular methods, including MixMHCpred, NetMHCpan (v4.0), and MHCflurry, when evaluated on independent HLA eluted ligand datasets, with an average 0.1%PPV of 53.58%, compared to 40.50%, 40.20%, 29.81%, and 25.57% achieved by MixMHCpred, NetMHCpan (EL), NetMHCpan (BA), and MHCflurry, respectively. Conclusion: By integrating MS and expression data, EPIC is superior to currently available methods in predicting epitope presentation for the 66 common HLA alleles that our models were built on. Citation Format: Weipeng Hu, Si Qiu, Youping Li, Geng Liu, Xiuqing Zhang, Leo J Lee. EPIC: MHC-I epitope prediction integrating mass spectrometry derived motifs and tissue-specific expression profiles [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3383.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207