Bibliographic record
Abstract
Public leadership across boundaries Dear reader, These are confusing times for public leaders around the globe.Inclusive leadership and innovative approaches in public services are called for to address the complex challenges of today and tomorrow.The cross-cutting theme of this special edition is: "public leadership across boundaries".Boundaries do not only get crossed in literal terms, by studying leadership practice in other countries, but also figuratively by looking beyond the traditional approaches towards leadership, including other perspectives and exploring new ways of leading.It is a privilege and my pleasure to present this special edition, as an off-spring of the International Leadership Association's 2015 Annual Conference on "Leading Across Borders and Generations".As the 2015 Chair of ILA's MIG Public Leadership, I committed to bridging the work of scholars and practitioners around the theme of public leadership.Connecting contexts and content, this special edition aims to provide inspiration for those who practice, study, teach and engage in leadership in the public domain.Global and local complex challenges and their leadership implications are addressed in this special edition's papers, with a focus on political, governmental, non-profit, social and civic contexts and their representatives, organisations and institutions alike.All of these are characterised by an emphasis on serving the greater public good.The first paper shows that unethical leaders can "cross the line" by harming the organisation for their own profit, as one of the articles on corporate psychopaths suggests.Using a historical approach, the paper finds that some ethical scandals and failures have been characterised by the presence of CEOs who scored highly on a measure of corporate psychopathy.It is argued that crossing ethical and legal boundaries could be prevented by having a clear view of what leadership entails.The second paper strives to do so by reviewing and criticising conventional assumptions about leadership and puts forward an alternative perspective.The study demonstrates that when these assumptions about leadership are "peeled back", a new way of understanding leadership is revealed.Leadership can then be conceived as a different form of in-the-moment action to management.The third paper finds ways for leaders to sustain themselves and others while working in service of the common good by having public values guide their actions.This way of thinking moves beyond the individualised perspective and offers new insights in leading through transitions that occur during changing times and challenges.Such changing times are addressed in the fourth paper, dealing with Myanmar, as well.New ways of leading and learning are explored to nurture the development of citizen leaders for building a democratic society.The research analyses how a citizen leadership development programme could contribute to Myanmar's progress.A somewhat similar case is studied in the fifth paper on the Philippines, where a vast human capital in the youth segment is left untapped, even though the young people can be mobilised towards ensuring a better future for their communities and the country.The research explores the experiences gained by participants of youth leadership programmes that could enhance this human capital.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".