Bibliographic record
Abstract
Akira Kurosawa’s Th e Idiot (Hakuchi, 1951)1 is a problematic transposition of Dostoevsky’s novel into fi lm.2 Th e director’s attempt to reproduce his source text as closely as possible while simultaneously transferring the plot into post-World War II Hokkaido has generated a mixed critical reception. Although some commentators praise this relocation of Th e Idiot to a Japanese setting for its defamiliarizing eff ect,3 others view the recontextualization as unsuccessful due to Kurosawa’s inability to distance himself suffi ciently from Dostoevsky. Donald Richie, judging the fi lm to be “neither Dostoevsky nor Kurosawa,” argues that the director “did nothing at all toward adapting the characters to their Japanese milieu” (81). Stephen Prince, similarly, concludes that Kurosawa merely “translates” Dostoevsky’s novel, whereas he “transforms” Shakespeare and Maxim Gorky, respectively, in Th rone of Blood (his relatively loose transposition of Macbeth) and Th e Lower Depths (142). Even critics who appraise the fi lm negatively, however, note Kurosawa’s artistic and philosophical confl uence with Dostoevsky’s themes and central concerns.4 Prince cites, among other shared tendencies, their common interest in cataclysmic events (135-39). Th e fi lm, indeed, engages the novel largely through a focus on its apocalyptic elements: execution motifs, the use of weather as an agent of catastrophe, and an overall sense of inevitable disaster. Kurosawa’s representation of this material, however, diff ers from Dostoevsky’s in striking ways. He reconfi gures Th e Idiot in light of the Japanese defeat in World War II, thereby exploring the novel’s uncanny relevance for his society. In doing so, he turns an apocalyptic novel into a post-apocalyptic fi lm. In Bakhtinian terms, he transforms Dostoevsky’s chronotope, with its dynamic, frenzied depiction of onrushing catastrophe, into a frozen, static temporal and spatial representation of an exhausted postwar Japan. From this perspective, Kurosawa’s changes to the novel
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".