MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251951924 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14665203.v1

Expert system for dimensioning reinforcement and connections of wood with steel

2021· preprint· en· W4251951924 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Structural Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimensioningEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ecological and sustainability values in the construction sector have become increasingly important, likewise the demand for timber constructions have increased. Simultaneously opportunities have developed to enhance the structural disadvantages of timber, leading to more economic and efficient structures. The engineering office Knippers Helbig does not only design timber structures frequently but is also a pioneer regarding the use of timber as a solid building material. This leads to the idea to develop a tool for a particular project and as a preparation tool for following project which enables the firm to evaluate advance calculations. Solutions were sought for strengthening in flexure and tension perpendicular to the grain of timber with steel as well as dimensioning connections with glued-in steel sections. With the tool, quick feasibility and variant studies for reinforcement and connection types are possible. Furthermore each dimensioning method is based on standardized calculations, so detailed verification can be performed. Da ökologische und nachhaltige Werte in den letzten Jahrzehnten auch im Bausektor von immer größerer Bedeutung werden, ist die Nachfrage nach Holzkonstruktion kontinuierlich gestiegen. Gleichzeitig oder grade deswegen entwickelten sich Möglichkeiten die strukturellen Nachteile von Holz auszubessern, was zu ökonomischeren und effizienteren Strukturen führte. Das Ingenieurbüro Knippers Helbig plant nicht nur gerne und häufig Holzkonstruktionen, sondern ist auch Vorreiter, was die Verwendung von Holz als Massivbaustoff betrifft. Daraus ergab sich die Idee, dass für ein Projekt im Speziellen und als Vorbereitung für folgende ein Tool entwickelt werden sollte, dass es ermöglicht weiterführenden Dimensionierungen zu berechnen. Dabei ging es darum Biege- und Querzugverstärkungen von Holz mit Stahl zu bemessen sowie Anschlüsse mit eingeklebten Stahlquerschnitten zu dimensionieren. Mit dem Tool dieser Masterarbeit ist es möglich zum einen schnelle Machbarkeits-, sowie Variantenstudien von Bewehrungs- oder Anschlusstypen durchzuführen, aber zum anderen liegen jedem Nachweis genormte bzw. bauaufsichtlich zugestimmten Berechnungen zugrunde, sodass Detailnachweise geführt werden können.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it