Proceedings of the second American Conference on Human Vibration, June 4-6, 2008, Chicago, Illinois.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We are proud to have cosponsored the Second American Conference on Human Vibration in Chicago, Illinois.Much hard work and diligent effort went into making this meeting a success and an avenue for future work in human vibration and health initiatives.The goal and the main thrust of the conference were to provide a forum for scientists, engineers, medical doctors, industrial hygienists, and educators to learn and advance research/education in the unique area of human body vibration.In promoting health and safety and in stimulating progress, leaders in the field were invited to share their insight and expertise in addition to the excellent and plausible papers on the presentation schedule.We hope that the proceedings of the conference, published here, will serve as a means of continuing the dialogue.This unique forum afforded participants opportunities to learn firsthand what their peers and colleagues are working on and to exchange information on a variety of relevant topics including human response, human modeling, experimental design, sensors, new technologies, and epidemiology studies in human responses to hand-transmitted and whole-body vibration.This research is essential for better understanding the risk factors for adverse effects related to vibration and for designing more effective interventions to prevent painful and potentially disabling work-related injuries.This conference addressed contemporary issues regarding occupational health, prevention measures, and scientific data collection used to study the complex, dynamic human response to vibration.The agenda included a rich and diverse scientific program as researchers and medical professionals from around the world gathered to examine human responses to hand-transmitted vibration and whole-body vibration.Special thanks are extended to the University of Illinois at Chicago for hosting the Second American Conference on Human Vibration as well as the scientific presenters from both the U.S. and abroad who shared their work and participated in advancing the science toward achieving safer and healthier workplaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.235 | 0.092 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".