Neutronic analysis of an ads fuelled with minor actinide and designed for spent fuel enrichment and fissile fuel production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents analyses of enrichments of uranium taken out from Canada Deuterium Uranium and pressurized water reactors spent fuels and fissile fuel breeding from thorium in two different helium cooled-accelerator driven system designs, DESIGN A and DESIGN B. In the beginning, the 235U percentages in the uranium fuels taken out from the reactors spent fuels are 0.17% and 0.91%, respectively. Both system cores are fuelled with two different minor actinides compositions extracted from PWR-MOX spent fuels. The DESIGN A has one transmutation zone (enrichment zone) surrounding the fuel core and containing thorium or spent uranium fuels, while DESIGN B has a second transmutation zone (fissile fuel breeding zone) surrounding the first transmutation zone and containing only thorium fuel. In brief, a total of ten cases formed by the combinations of accelerator driven system designs, minor actinides components, and spent uranium with thorium fuels are analysed, which are six in DESIGN A containing one transmutation zone and four in DESIGN B containing two transmutation zones. Lead-bismuth eutectic alloy, a liquid heavy metal, consisting of 45% lead and 55 % bismuth is used as target material in the investigated accelerator driven system. It is assumed that the target is bombarded with 1.2383?1017 protons per second and that the energy of each proton is 1000 MeV. This means a proton beam power of 20 MW. The 3-D and time-dependent neutronic analyses are conducted by using the MCNPX 2.7 and CINDER 90 nuclear code. Both accelerator driven system designs are operated until the values of keff rise to 0.985 to determine the longest operation times that are the effective burn times in all cases. Depending on the design, minor actinide composition, and fuel type (spent UO2 and ThO2), the results obtained at the end of cycle exhibit the effective burn times vary from 300 days to 2050 days, the fuel enrichments can reach up to 2.49-4.23% and the values of gain reach up to 10.8-25.1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".