MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252177735 · doi:10.1149/ma2019-02/19/1026

Road Salt Reduction from Source Water Using 3-Compartment Borohydride/ Hydrogen Peroxide Desalination Cell

2019· article· en· W4252177735 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shawn Nicholas Hamilton, Amarjeet Bassi, Dimitri Karamanev

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChemical Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSodium borohydrideGeobacter sulfurreducensDesalinationChemistryCompartment (ship)Hydrogen peroxideElectrochemistryMicrobial fuel cellDesulfovibrioInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringPulp and paper industryAnodeMembraneCatalysisSulfateBiochemistryOrganic chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The road salt that is applied to sidewalks, driveways, roads and parking lots makes its way to our local waterways killing freshwater biotas as well as decreasing structures working life through increasing corrosion rates. Recycling road salt is essential to reduce the ever-increasing amounts used in Quebec and Ontario, Canada. Using electrochemical desalination cells is investigated to regenerate the salt. The optimization includes solvent selection, establishing a compact design and increasing the removal rate with as little energy requirement as possible. This paper reports the optimum combined conditions obtained so far. In a 2-compartment cell, Direct Borohydride Fuel Cell (DBFC), based on sodium borohydride (NaBH4) and hydrogen peroxide provided better current and power densities in comparison to Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC), based on methanol and peroxide. This agrees with several review papers comparing these two fuel cell types. For further testing NaBH4 was substituted with potassium borohydride (KBH4) in a 3-compartment cell, t producing a highly-desalinated effluent. The sodium ions (Na+) and chloride ions (Cl-) were 98.7% and 99.2% removed, respectively. The maximum open circuit voltage (OCV) is 1.49 V, but quickly drops to 1.23 V. Future work includes incorporation of microbes (mixed culture) in the anodic compartment against a variation of several microalgae species in the cathodic compartment such as Desulfovibrio vulgaris, Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella putrefaciens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicChemical Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207